DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Volvo 240 vs 1992 Audi 80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo 240

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

51.5–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo 240SpecificationAudi 80
VolvoMakeAudi
240Model80
1992Model year1992
SedanBody typeSedan
4+1Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Volvo 240SpecificationAudi 80
—0–100 km/h13,6 s
0 km/hTop speed177 km/h
2382 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
82 HPPower90 HP
140 NmTorque148 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo 240SpecificationAudi 80
DieselFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank66 lt
10 ltUrban consumption—
6 ltExtra-urban consumption6,8 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo 240SpecificationAudi 80
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
3Gears5
—Tyre size195/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo 240SpecificationAudi 80
—Length4482 mm
—Width1695 mm
—Height1406 mm
1830 KgWeight1190 Kg
—Wheelbase2612 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Volvo 240 and 1992 Audi 80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo 240 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…