E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Volvo 240 vs 1992 Mazda 323 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo 240

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

44.25–44
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo 240SpecificationMazda 323
VolvoMakeMazda
240Model323
1992Model year1992
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Volvo 240SpecificationMazda 323
0 km/hTop speed150 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement0 cc
115 HPPower56 HP
0 NmTorque0 Nm

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo 240SpecificationMazda 323
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Average consumption5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo 240SpecificationMazda 323
—Gears5
—Tyre size175/70 R13

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Volvo 240 and 1992 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo 240 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

1992 Dodge DakotaVS1992 Volvo 240Dodge Dakota vs Volvo 2401992 and 1992 model yearsImage unavailableVS1992 Volvo 240Mercedes-Benz T-mod. vs Volvo 2401992 and 1992 model years1992 Peugeot 405VS1992 Volvo 240Peugeot 405 vs Volvo 2401992 and 1992 model years1992 Nissan MicraVS1992 Volvo 240Nissan Micra vs Volvo 2401992 and 1992 model years1992 Mazda 323VS1992 Volvo 240Mazda 323 vs Volvo 2401992 and 1992 model years

Comments are loading…