DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Volkswagen W12 vs 2013 Audi RS 7 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi RS 7

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 8 points.

88.5–96.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeAudi
W12ModelRS 7
2004Model year2013
CoupeBody typeHatchback
2Seats4
2Doors5

Performance

3,5 s0–100 km/h3,9 s
350 km/hTop speed250 km/h
5998 ccEngine displacement3993 cc
600 HPPower560 HP
620 NmTorque700 Nm
12Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank65 lt
20 ltUrban consumption13,9 lt
11 ltExtra-urban consumption7,5 lt
—Average consumption9,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears8 Tiptronic
255/35 R19Tyre size275/35 R20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4555 mmLength5012 mm
1920 mmWidth1911 mm
1100 mmHeight1419 mm
1200 KgWeight1930 Kg
2630 mmWheelbase2915 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Volkswagen W12 and 2013 Audi RS 7 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi RS 7 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 8 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…