DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Volkswagen Up! vs 2016 Tata Nano Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Up!

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

58.25–57.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeTata
Up!ModelNano
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
3Doors5

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h—
185 km/hTop speed105 km/h
999 ccEngine displacement624 cc
90 HPPower38 HP
160 NmTorque51 Nm
3Cylinders2

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
35 ltFuel tank24 lt
5,5 ltUrban consumption—
3,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
175/65 R14; 185/55 R15Tyre size135/70 R12; 155/65 R12
YesABS—

Dimensions

3600 mmLength3164 mm
1641 mmWidth1750 mm
1504 mmHeight1652 mm
927 KgWeight695-735 Kg
2407 mmWheelbase2230 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Volkswagen Up! and 2016 Tata Nano approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Up! leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…