DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Buick Regal vs 1995 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Buick Regal

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

61.5–61.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BuickMakeLand Rover
RegalModelRange Rover
1995Model year1995
CoupeBody typeEstate
5Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h14,3 s
0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
2838 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
132 HPPower136 HP
231 NmTorque270 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank100 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption12,8 lt
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption8,9 lt
10,2 ltAverage consumption10,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4 HydramaticGears5
205/70 R14Tyre size235/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4882 mmLength4713 mm
1842 mmWidth1853 mm
1346 mmHeight1817 mm
1426 KgWeight2115 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2745 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Buick Regal and 1995 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Buick Regal leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…