DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Volkswagen Sharan vs 2009 Volvo XC60 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Sharan

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeVolvo
SharanModelXC60
2009Model year2009
MinivanBody typeSUV
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,3 s0–100 km/h9,4 s
214 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2792 ccEngine displacement3192 cc
204 HPPower238 HP
270 NmTorque320 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank70 lt
15,1 ltUrban consumption16,2 lt
8,9 ltExtra-urban consumption8,3 lt
14,6 ltAverage consumption11,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears—
215/55 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4634 mmLength4627 mm
1810 mmWidth1888 mm
1730 mmHeight1713 mm
1840 KgWeight1874 Kg
2841 mmWheelbase2774 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Volkswagen Sharan and 2009 Volvo XC60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Sharan leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…