DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Volkswagen Sharan vs 2000 Daewoo Rezzo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Daewoo Rezzo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

50.25–50.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeDaewoo
SharanModelRezzo
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeMinivan
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

15,4 s0–100 km/h12,4 s
177 km/hTop speed104 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
116 HPPower128 HP
166 NmTorque176 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
13,9 ltUrban consumption15,1 lt
7,7 ltExtra-urban consumption8,2 lt
—Average consumption10,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
195/65 R15 TTyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4617 mmLength4350 mm
1810 mmWidth1750 mm
1730 mmHeight1580 mm
1715 KgWeight1392 Kg
2835 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Volkswagen Sharan and 2000 Daewoo Rezzo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Daewoo Rezzo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…