DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Volkswagen Sharan vs 2014 Volvo V40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Sharan

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

71.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeVolvo
SharanModelV40
2014Model year2014
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5/7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

8,3 s0–100 km/h8,7 s
218 km/hTop speed220 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
200 HPPower180 HP
280 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank62 lt
11,5 ltUrban consumption—
6,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,4 ltAverage consumption7,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6 DSGGears6
215/60 R16; 225/50 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4854 mmLength4369 mm
1904 mmWidth1857 mm
1720 mmHeight1439 mm
1790 KgWeight—
2919 mmWheelbase2647 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Volkswagen Sharan and 2014 Volvo V40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Sharan leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…