DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Volkswagen Sharan vs 2010 Citroen C3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen C3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeCitroen
SharanModelC3
2010Model year2010
MinivanBody typeHatchback
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

14,3 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
178 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
116 HPPower112 HP
310 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank48 lt
9,1 ltUrban consumption5,5 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption3,8 lt
—Average consumption4,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/60 R15Tyre size195/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4634 mmLength3941 mm
1810 mmWidth1728 mm
1730 mmHeight1524 mm
1770 KgWeight1090 Kg
2841 mmWheelbase2466 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Volkswagen Sharan and 2010 Citroen C3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen C3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…