1990 • Buick
Regal
Buick Regal 2.8 V6 (127 Hp) 1990Overall Score61.5/100
1990 Buick Regal vs 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1990 • Oldsmobile
Cutlass
Oldsmobile Cutlass 2.5 i (106 Hp) 1990Overall Score62.25/100
WINNER
Oldsmobile Cutlass
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Buick RegalSpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
BuickMakeOldsmobile
RegalModelCutlass
1990Model year1990
CoupeBody typeSedan
5Seats5
2Doors4
Performance
Buick RegalSpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
2838 ccEngine displacement2471 cc
127 HPPower106 HP
217 NmTorque183 Nm
6Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Buick RegalSpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank51 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption14 lt
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption8 lt
10,2 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Buick RegalSpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4 HydramaticGears5
195/75 R14Tyre size185/75 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Buick RegalSpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
4882 mmLength4555 mm
1824 mmWidth1700 mm
1346 mmHeight1330 mm
1380 KgWeight1185 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2625 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1990 Buick Regal and 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Oldsmobile Cutlass leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…