DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Volkswagen Sharan vs 2004 Renault Scenic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Scenic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeRenault
SharanModelScenic
2004Model year2004
MinivanBody typeMinivan
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

13,7 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
181 km/hTop speed192 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1870 cc
115 HPPower100 HP
310 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,3 ltUrban consumption7,4 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
6,3 ltAverage consumption6,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4634 mmLength4259 mm
1810 mmWidth1810 mm
1730 mmHeight1620 mm
1678 KgWeight—
2841 mmWheelbase2685 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Volkswagen Sharan and 2004 Renault Scenic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Scenic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…