DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Volkswagen Sharan vs 2000 Land Rover Freelander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Sharan

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeLand Rover
SharanModelFreelander
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeOff-road vehicle
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

13,7 s0–100 km/h11,8 s
181 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
115 HPPower117 HP
310 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,3 ltUrban consumption12,9 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption8,1 lt
6,3 ltAverage consumption9,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size195/80 R15 S; 215/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4634 mmLength4368 mm
1810 mmWidth1809 mm
1730 mmHeight1708 mm
1678 KgWeight1510 Kg
2841 mmWheelbase2557 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Volkswagen Sharan and 2000 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Sharan leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…