DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Volkswagen Sharan vs 1996 Lancia Dedra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lancia Dedra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

52.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeLancia
SharanModelDedra
1996Model year1996
MinivanBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

16,4 s0–100 km/h10,3 s
172 km/hTop speed191 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1747 cc
110 HPPower113 HP
235 NmTorque154 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank63 lt
8,6 ltUrban consumption—
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption7,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4620 mmLength4343 mm
1810 mmWidth1700 mm
1730 mmHeight1430 mm
1665 KgWeight1310 Kg
2835 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Volkswagen Sharan and 1996 Lancia Dedra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lancia Dedra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…