DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Volkswagen Sharan vs 2016 Audi A3 Sedan Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Sharan

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

70.5–69.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeAudi
SharanModelA3 Sedan
2016Model year2016
MinivanBody typeSedan
5/7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

6,7 s0–100 km/h10,1 s
200 km/hTop speed202 km/h
1395 ccEngine displacement1395 cc
150 HPPower125 HP
250 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank50 lt
7,9 ltUrban consumption6,1 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
6,4 ltAverage consumption5,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears7
—TransmissionS-Tronic
215/60 R16; 225/50 R17; 225/45 R18Tyre size16
YesABSNo

Dimensions

4854 mmLength4456 mm
1904 mmWidth1796 mm
1720 mmHeight1416 mm
1628 KgWeight1310 kg
—Luggage capacity425 lt
2920 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Volkswagen Sharan and 2016 Audi A3 Sedan approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Sharan leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…