DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Volkswagen Scirocco vs 2010 Mazda CX-7 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-7

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

78.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeMazda
SciroccoModelCX-7
2014Model year2010
HatchbackBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

7,1 s0–100 km/h—
233 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement2260 cc
211 HPPower260 HP
280 NmTorque380 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank69 lt
10,5 ltUrban consumption13 lt
6,0 ltExtra-urban consumption9,8 lt
8,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
DSGTransmission—
17Tyre size235/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4256 mmLength4675 mm
1810 mmWidth1872 mm
1404 mmHeight1645 mm
1393 kgWeight1782 Kg
292 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2750 mm

Additional Features

Volkswagen SciroccoDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistAuto HoldTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip Computerstart-stopArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelCooled GloveboxDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRear Parking SensorsReversing Camera
Mazda CX-7

No additional feature records are available.

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Volkswagen Scirocco and 2010 Mazda CX-7 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-7 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…