DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Volkswagen Scirocco vs 2011 Citroen C-Crosser Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen C-Crosser

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeCitroen
SciroccoModelC-Crosser
2011Model year2011
CoupeBody typeSUV
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

8,1 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
222 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1968 ccEngine displacement2359 cc
170 HPPower170 HP
0 NmTorque232 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
6,5 ltUrban consumption12,6 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption7,6 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption9,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
—Tyre size215/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4256 mmLength4646 mm
1810 mmWidth1806 mm
1404 mmHeight1715 mm
1395 KgWeight1650 Kg
2578 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Volkswagen Scirocco and 2011 Citroen C-Crosser approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen C-Crosser leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…