2017 • Volkswagen
Polo
Volkswagen Polo 1.8 TSI (192 Hp) 2017Overall Score72.75/100
2017 Volkswagen Polo vs 2017 Opel Cascada Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2017 • Opel
Cascada
Opel Cascada 1.6 (200 Hp) 2017Overall Score73.5/100
WINNER
Opel Cascada
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
72.75–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationOpel Cascada
VolkswagenMakeOpel
PoloModelCascada
2017Model year2017
HatchbackBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
3/5Doors2
Performance
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationOpel Cascada
6,7 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
236 km/hTop speed235 km/h
1798 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
192 HPPower200 HP
320 NmTorque280 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationOpel Cascada
PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank56 lt
7,6 ltUrban consumption8,6 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
6,0 ltAverage consumption6,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationOpel Cascada
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationOpel Cascada
3983 mmLength4696 mm
1682 mmWidth1839 mm
1450 mmHeight1443 mm
1197 KgWeight1701-1816 Kg
2468 mmWheelbase2695 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2017 Volkswagen Polo and 2017 Opel Cascada approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Cascada leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…