DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Volkswagen Polo vs 2009 Mazda RX-8 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda RX-8

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeMazda
PoloModelRX-8
2014Model year2009
HatchbackBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
3/5Doors4

Performance

6,7 s0–100 km/h—
236 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1798 ccEngine displacement1308 cc
192 HPPower215 HP
320 NmTorque216 Nm
4Cylinders2

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank61 lt
7,6 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
6,0 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size225/55R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3983 mmLength4427 mm
1682 mmWidth1770 mm
1450 mmHeight1340 mm
1197 KgWeight1395 Kg
2468 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Volkswagen Polo and 2009 Mazda RX-8 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda RX-8 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…