DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Volkswagen Polo vs 2014 Suzuki Ciaz Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Polo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeSuzuki
PoloModelCiaz
2014Model year2014
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4

Performance

10,9 s0–100 km/h—
184 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1422 ccEngine displacement1373 cc
90 HPPower92 HP
230 NmTorque130 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank43 lt
4,0 ltUrban consumption—
3,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
3,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size185/65 R15; 195/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3972 mmLength4490 mm
1682 mmWidth1730 mm
1453 mmHeight1475 mm
1151 KgWeight1010-1030 Kg
2470 mmWheelbase2650 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Volkswagen Polo and 2014 Suzuki Ciaz approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Polo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…