DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Volkswagen Polo vs 2016 Fiat Egea Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Egea

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 16.25 points.

56.25–72.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeFiat
PoloModelEgea
2014Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

10,9 s0–100 km/h9,8 s
184 km/hTop speed199 km/h
1422 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
90 HPPower120 HP
230 NmTorque320 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
45 ltFuel tank45 lt
4,0 ltUrban consumption5,2 lt
3,1 ltExtra-urban consumption3,6 lt
3,4 ltAverage consumption4,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
—TransmissionManual
—Tyre size17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3972 mmLength4532 mm
1682 mmWidth1792 mm
1453 mmHeight1497 mm
1151 KgWeight1270 kg
—Luggage capacity520 lt
2470 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Fiat EgeaDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistCruise ControlComing HomeLeaving HomeTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip ComputerArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsAlloy WheelsRear Parking SensorsReversing CameraAuto-dimming Rear-view MirrorRain SensorLight SensorUSB PortBluetoothNavigation

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Volkswagen Polo and 2016 Fiat Egea approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Egea leads the E-Kıyasla score by 16.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…