2003 • Volkswagen
Polo
Volkswagen Polo 1.4 FSI (86 Hp) 2003Overall Score47.25/100
2003 Volkswagen Polo vs 2003 Ford Fusion Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Ford
Fusion
Ford Fusion 1.4 TDCi (68 Hp) 2003Overall Score46.25/100
WINNER
Volkswagen Polo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationFord Fusion
VolkswagenMakeFord
PoloModelFusion
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors5
Performance
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationFord Fusion
12,1 s0–100 km/h15,5 s
178 km/hTop speed158 km/h
1390 ccEngine displacement1399 cc
86 HPPower68 HP
130 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationFord Fusion
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
45 ltFuel tank45 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption5,2 lt
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption3,9 lt
—Average consumption4,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationFord Fusion
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationFord Fusion
3897 mmLength4020 mm
1650 mmWidth1708 mm
1465 mmHeight1503 mm
1040 KgWeight1105 Kg
2460 mmWheelbase2488 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Volkswagen Polo and 2003 Ford Fusion approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volkswagen Polo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…