2004 • Volkswagen
Polo
Volkswagen Polo 1.4 16V (101 Hp) 2004Overall Score54.25/100
2004 Volkswagen Polo vs 2004 Smart Forfour Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Smart
Forfour
Smart Forfour 1.5 cdi (95 Hp) 2004Overall Score53.25/100
WINNER
Volkswagen Polo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationSmart Forfour
VolkswagenMakeSmart
PoloModelForfour
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
3/5Doors5
Performance
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationSmart Forfour
10,0 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
188 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1390 ccEngine displacement1493 cc
101 HPPower95 HP
126 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders3
Fuel & Consumption
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationSmart Forfour
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
45 ltFuel tank47 lt
9,6 ltUrban consumption5,8 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption3,9 lt
—Average consumption4,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationSmart Forfour
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55 R14Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationSmart Forfour
3743 mmLength3752 mm
1632 mmWidth1684 mm
1418 mmHeight1450 mm
925 KgWeight965 Kg
2407 mmWheelbase2500 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Volkswagen Polo and 2004 Smart Forfour approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volkswagen Polo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…