DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Buick Regal vs 2010 Cadillac BLS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Buick Regal

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.75–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BuickMakeCadillac
RegalModelBLS
2011Model year2010
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,7 s
0 km/hTop speed220 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
223 HPPower175 HP
349 NmTorque265 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank58 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption11,2 lt
7,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
9,8 ltAverage consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
235/50 R18Tyre size225/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4831 mmLength4680 mm
1857 mmWidth1752 mm
1483 mmHeight1471 mm
1665 KgWeight—
2738 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Buick Regal and 2010 Cadillac BLS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Buick Regal leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…