DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Volkswagen Polo vs 2007 ZAZ 1105 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Polo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

43.25–42.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeZAZ
PoloModel1105
2004Model year2007
HatchbackBody typePick-up
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

17,5 s0–100 km/h17,0 s
152 km/hTop speed148 km/h
1198 ccEngine displacement1197 cc
54 HPPower58 HP
106 NmTorque90 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank38 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption—
4,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption7,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 R14Tyre size155/70 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3897 mmLength3900 mm
1650 mmWidth1676 mm
1465 mmHeight1600 mm
980 KgWeight760 Kg
2460 mmWheelbase2320 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Volkswagen Polo and 2007 ZAZ 1105 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Polo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…