DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Volkswagen Polo vs 2005 ZAZ 1103 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Polo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

43.25–42.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeZAZ
PoloModel1103
2004Model year2005
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

17,5 s0–100 km/h17,4 s
152 km/hTop speed147 km/h
1198 ccEngine displacement1197 cc
54 HPPower58 HP
106 NmTorque90 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank38 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption—
4,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 R14Tyre size155/70 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3897 mmLength3980 mm
1650 mmWidth1564 mm
1465 mmHeight1425 mm
980 KgWeight790 Kg
2460 mmWheelbase2320 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Volkswagen Polo and 2005 ZAZ 1103 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Polo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…