DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Buick Regal vs 2012 Volvo S40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Buick Regal

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BuickMakeVolvo
RegalModelS40
2013Model year2012
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

13,5 s0–100 km/h11,9 s
192 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
112 HPPower100 HP
147 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Petrol / LPGFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank55 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption9,2 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
7,6 ltAverage consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/60/ R16; 225/55 R17; 245/45 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4831 mmLength4476 mm
1857 mmWidth1770 mm
1483 mmHeight1454 mm
1503 KgWeight1311 Kg
2738 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Buick Regal and 2012 Volvo S40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Buick Regal leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…