2005 • Volkswagen
Polo
Volkswagen Polo 1.2 (70 Hp) 2005Overall Score53.25/100
2005 Volkswagen Polo vs 2004 Tata Mint Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Tata
Mint
Tata Mint 1.4 i (65 Hp) 2004Overall Score52.5/100
WINNER
Volkswagen Polo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
53.25–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationTata Mint
VolkswagenMakeTata
PoloModelMint
2005Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors5
Performance
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationTata Mint
14,5 s0–100 km/h—
167 km/hTop speed140 km/h
1422 ccEngine displacement1405 cc
70 HPPower65 HP
155 NmTorque0 Nm
3Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationTata Mint
DieselFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank37 lt
7,6 ltUrban consumption—
4,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,8 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationTata Mint
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 R14Tyre size155/70 R13
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationTata Mint
3897 mmLength3660 mm
1650 mmWidth1625 mm
1465 mmHeight1480 mm
1095 KgWeight850 Kg
2460 mmWheelbase2400 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2005 Volkswagen Polo and 2004 Tata Mint approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volkswagen Polo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…