DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Volkswagen Polo vs 2013 Alfa Romeo MiTo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Polo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

57.25–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeAlfa Romeo
PoloModelMiTo
2013Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats4/5
5Doors3

Performance

9,7 s0–100 km/h12,9 s
190 km/hTop speed174 km/h
1197 ccEngine displacement1248 cc
105 HPPower85 HP
0 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
45 ltFuel tank45 lt
6,8 ltUrban consumption4,4 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption2,9 lt
5,3 ltAverage consumption3,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size195/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3970 mmLength4063 mm
1682 mmWidth1720 mm
1462 mmHeight1446 mm
1088 KgWeight1150 Kg
2470 mmWheelbase2511 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Volkswagen Polo and 2013 Alfa Romeo MiTo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Polo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…