DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Volkswagen Polo vs 2016 Honda Civic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda Civic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

55.25–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeHonda
PoloModelCivic
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h13,0 s
191 km/hTop speed177 km/h
999 ccEngine displacement1339 cc
95 HPPower100 HP
160 NmTorque127 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank50 lt
5,0 ltUrban consumption7,3 lt
3,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,0 lt
4,1 ltAverage consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
185/60 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3972 mmLength4250 mm
1682 mmWidth1760 mm
1453 mmHeight1460 mm
1036 KgWeight1186 Kg
2470 mmWheelbase2635 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Volkswagen Polo and 2016 Honda Civic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda Civic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…