DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Volkswagen Polo vs 2016 Alfa Romeo MiTo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo MiTo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

55.25–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeAlfa Romeo
PoloModelMiTo
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats4/5
3/5Doors3

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h11,4 s
191 km/hTop speed184 km/h
999 ccEngine displacement875 cc
95 HPPower105 HP
160 NmTorque145 Nm
3Cylinders2

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank45 lt
5,0 ltUrban consumption5,0 lt
3,6 ltExtra-urban consumption3,8 lt
4,1 ltAverage consumption4,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
185/60 R15Tyre size195/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3972 mmLength4063 mm
1682 mmWidth1720 mm
1453 mmHeight1446 mm
1036 KgWeight1130 Kg
2470 mmWheelbase2511 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Volkswagen Polo and 2016 Alfa Romeo MiTo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo MiTo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…