DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Volkswagen Polo vs 2012 Mazda Az-offroad Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Az-offroad

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

55.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeMazda
PoloModelAz-offroad
2015Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats4
3/5Doors3

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h—
191 km/hTop speed125 km/h
999 ccEngine displacement658 cc
95 HPPower64 HP
160 NmTorque106 Nm
3Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank40 lt
5,0 ltUrban consumption12 lt
3,6 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt
4,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R15Tyre size175/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3972 mmLength3395 mm
1682 mmWidth1475 mm
1453 mmHeight1680 mm
1036 KgWeight960 Kg
2470 mmWheelbase2250 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Volkswagen Polo and 2012 Mazda Az-offroad approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Az-offroad leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…