1996 • Volkswagen
Polo
Volkswagen Polo 1.0 (45 Hp) 1996Overall Score36.5/100
1996 Volkswagen Polo vs 2000 Daewoo Damas Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Daewoo
Damas
Daewoo Damas 0.8 i (38 Hp) 2000Overall Score37.5/100
WINNER
Daewoo Damas
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
36.5–37.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationDaewoo Damas
VolkswagenMakeDaewoo
PoloModelDamas
1996Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats2
3/5Doors3
Performance
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationDaewoo Damas
21,4 s0–100 km/h24,5 s
145 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1043 ccEngine displacement796 cc
45 HPPower38 HP
76 NmTorque64 Nm
4Cylinders3
Fuel & Consumption
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationDaewoo Damas
PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank37 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationDaewoo Damas
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/70 R13Tyre size—
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationDaewoo Damas
3715 mmLength3230 mm
1655 mmWidth1400 mm
1420 mmHeight1920 mm
955 KgWeight—
2400 mmWheelbase1840 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Volkswagen Polo and 2000 Daewoo Damas approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Daewoo Damas leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…