DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Volkswagen Polo vs 2016 Skoda Fabia Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Skoda Fabia

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 2 points.

60.25–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeSkoda
PoloModelFabia
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,8 s0–100 km/h9,4 s
184 km/hTop speed196 km/h
1197 ccEngine displacement1197 cc
90 HPPower110 HP
160 NmTorque175 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank45 lt
6,0 ltUrban consumption6,1 lt
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption4,0 lt
5,0 ltAverage consumption4,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
ManualTransmission—
15Tyre size185/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3972 mmLength3992 mm
1682 mmWidth1732 mm
1453 mmHeight1467 mm
1107 kgWeight1129 Kg
280 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2470 mm

Additional Features

Volkswagen PoloDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistTrip Computerstart-stopArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelCooled GloveboxManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsAuto-dimming Rear-view MirrorUSB PortBluetooth
Skoda Fabia

No additional feature records are available.

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Volkswagen Polo and 2016 Skoda Fabia approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Skoda Fabia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 2 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…