DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Volkswagen Polo vs 2015 Volkswagen Caddy Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Polo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

60.25–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeVolkswagen
PoloModelCaddy
2015Model year2015
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5/7
5Doors5

Performance

10,8 s0–100 km/h12,4 s
184 km/hTop speed169 km/h
1197 ccEngine displacement1197 cc
90 HPPower105 HP
160 NmTorque175 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank60 lt
6,0 ltUrban consumption8,0 lt
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
5,0 ltAverage consumption6,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
ManualTransmission—
15Tyre size195/65 R15; 205/55 R16; 205/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3972 mmLength4406 mm
1682 mmWidth1794 mm
1453 mmHeight1823 mm
1107 kgWeight1388 Kg
280 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2681 mm

Additional Features

Volkswagen PoloDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistTrip Computerstart-stopArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelCooled GloveboxManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsAuto-dimming Rear-view MirrorUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Volkswagen Polo and 2015 Volkswagen Caddy approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Polo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…