DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Volkswagen Polo vs 2016 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

60.25–61.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeRenault
PoloModelClio
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,8 s0–100 km/h—
184 km/hTop speed182 km/h
1197 ccEngine displacement898 cc
90 HPPower90 HP
160 NmTorque140 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank0 lt
6,0 ltUrban consumption5,7 lt
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption4,0 lt
5,0 ltAverage consumption4,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
7Gears5
DSGTransmission—
15Tyre size195/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3972 mmLength4267 mm
1682 mmWidth1732 mm
1453 mmHeight1475 mm
1139 kgWeight1055 Kg
280 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2589 mm

Additional Features

Volkswagen PoloDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistCruise ControlComing HomeLeaving HomeTrip Computerstart-stopArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelCooled GloveboxDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRear Parking SensorsAuto-dimming Rear-view MirrorRain SensorLight SensorUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Volkswagen Polo and 2016 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…