DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Volkswagen Passat vs 2010 Jaguar XJ Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar XJ

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.

78.75–79.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeJaguar
PassatModelXJ
2010Model year2010
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

6,9 s0–100 km/h6,4 s
246 km/hTop speed250 km/h
3189 ccEngine displacement2993 cc
250 HPPower275 HP
320 NmTorque0 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank82 lt
13,9 ltUrban consumption9,6 lt
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
9,8 ltAverage consumption7,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/55 R16Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4765 mmLength—
1820 mmWidth—
1472 mmHeight—
1492 KgWeight—
2710 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Volkswagen Passat and 2010 Jaguar XJ approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar XJ leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…