DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Volkswagen Passat vs 2005 MG ZT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeMG
PassatModelZT
2004Model year2005
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

8,7 s0–100 km/h8,3 s
226 km/hTop speed227 km/h
2496 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
180 HPPower190 HP
370 NmTorque245 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank65 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption14,3 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size225/45 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4703 mmLength4740 mm
1746 mmWidth1780 mm
1462 mmHeight1410 mm
1625 KgWeight1485 Kg
2703 mmWheelbase2746 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Volkswagen Passat and 2005 MG ZT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…