DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Volkswagen Passat vs 2004 MG ZT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeMG
PassatModelZT
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

11,2 s0–100 km/h11,7 s
200 km/hTop speed193 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1951 cc
115 HPPower116 HP
172 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank65 lt
12,3 ltUrban consumption7,7 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,7 lt
8,3 ltAverage consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size225/45 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4703 mmLength4740 mm
1746 mmWidth1780 mm
1462 mmHeight1410 mm
1340 KgWeight1535 Kg
2703 mmWheelbase2746 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Volkswagen Passat and 2004 MG ZT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…