DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Volkswagen Passat vs 2003 Nissan X-Trail Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan X-Trail

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeNissan
PassatModelX-Trail
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

11,2 s0–100 km/h13,7 s
200 km/hTop speed165 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement2184 cc
115 HPPower114 HP
172 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank60 lt
12,3 ltUrban consumption9,2 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6 lt
8,3 ltAverage consumption7,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears6
195/65 R15Tyre size215/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4703 mmLength4510 mm
1746 mmWidth1765 mm
1462 mmHeight1675 mm
1340 KgWeight1534 Kg
2703 mmWheelbase2625 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Volkswagen Passat and 2003 Nissan X-Trail approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan X-Trail leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…