DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Volkswagen Passat vs 2000 Volkswagen Polo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Polo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeVolkswagen
PassatModelPolo
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

11,2 s0–100 km/h10,6 s
200 km/hTop speed193 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
115 HPPower110 HP
172 NmTorque235 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank45 lt
12,3 ltUrban consumption6,5 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4 lt
8,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4703 mmLength4164 mm
1746 mmWidth1640 mm
1462 mmHeight1414 mm
1340 KgWeight1115 Kg
2703 mmWheelbase2441 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Volkswagen Passat and 2000 Volkswagen Polo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Polo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…