DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Volkswagen Passat vs 2012 Volkswagen Sharan Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Sharan

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeVolkswagen
PassatModelSharan
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeMinivan
5Seats5/7
5Doors5

Performance

8,7 s0–100 km/h8,3 s
211 km/hTop speed218 km/h
1968 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
177 HPPower200 HP
380 NmTorque280 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank70 lt
7,0 ltUrban consumption11,5 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,6 lt
5,9 ltAverage consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6 DSG
—Tyre size215/60 R16; 225/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4771 mmLength4854 mm
1820 mmWidth1904 mm
1550 mmHeight1720 mm
1726 KgWeight1790 Kg
2710 mmWheelbase2919 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Volkswagen Passat and 2012 Volkswagen Sharan approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Sharan leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…