DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Volkswagen Passat vs 2003 MG ZR Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeMG
PassatModelZR
2003Model year2003
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

10,7 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
197 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
130 HPPower113 HP
310 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,3 ltUrban consumption7,7 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
—Average consumption5,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4683 mmLength4011 mm
1746 mmWidth1690 mm
1498 mmHeight1400 mm
1550 KgWeight1155 Kg
2703 mmWheelbase2502 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Volkswagen Passat and 2003 MG ZR approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…