DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Volkswagen Passat vs 1996 Mazda 323 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 323

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeMazda
PassatModel323
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed191 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1840 cc
110 HPPower114 HP
235 NmTorque157 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank55 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption—
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/65 R14 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4670 mmLength4245 mm
1740 mmWidth1695 mm
1460 mmHeight1355 mm
1395 KgWeight1115 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2605 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Volkswagen Passat and 1996 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…