DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Volkswagen Passat vs 2000 Mitsubishi Carisma Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Passat

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeMitsubishi
PassatModelCarisma
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

12,4 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
191 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1834 cc
101 HPPower116 HP
240 NmTorque162 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank60 lt
7 ltUrban consumption8,7 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
—Average consumption6,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4703 mmLength4435 mm
1746 mmWidth1710 mm
1462 mmHeight1405 mm
1380 KgWeight1130 Kg
2703 mmWheelbase2550 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Volkswagen Passat and 2000 Mitsubishi Carisma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Passat leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…