DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1993 Volkswagen Passat vs 1994 Mitsubishi FTO Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Passat

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeMitsubishi
PassatModelFTO
1993Model year1994
EstateBody typeCoupe
5Seats2
—Doors2

Performance

260 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1800 ccEngine displacement1834 cc
125 HPPower126 HP
0 NmTorque161 Nm
—Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Average consumption17,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size185/70 R14 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4320 mm
—Width1735 mm
—Height1300 mm
—Weight1100 Kg
—Wheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1993 Volkswagen Passat and 1994 Mitsubishi FTO approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Passat leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…