DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 Acura CL vs 1997 Alfa Romeo 156 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Acura CL

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–63.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AcuraMakeAlfa Romeo
CLModel156
1997Model year1997
CoupeBody typeSedan
5Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

8,2 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
205 km/hTop speed203 km/h
2254 ccEngine displacement2387 cc
152 HPPower136 HP
206 NmTorque304 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank63 lt
9,6 ltUrban consumption8,2 lt
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
—Average consumption7,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size205/60R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4825 mmLength4430 mm
1780 mmWidth1745 mm
1390 mmHeight1415 mm
1390 KgWeight1350 Kg
2715 mmWheelbase2595 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 Acura CL and 1997 Alfa Romeo 156 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Acura CL leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…