DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2024 Volkswagen Golf R vs 2016 Ford Shelby Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Golf R

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 16.25 points.

100–83.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeFord
Golf RModelShelby
2024Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

4,7 s0–100 km/h—
270 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement5163 cc
320 HPPower533 HP
420 NmTorque582 Nm
4Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
52 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,3 ltUrban consumption16,8 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption11,2 lt
7,7 ltAverage consumption14,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
7Gears6
DSGTransmission—
19Tyre size305/30 ZR19; 315/30 ZR19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4290 mmLength4818 mm
1789 mmWidth1928 mm
1458 mmHeight1361 mm
1554 kgWeight1658 Kg
380 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2720 mm

Additional Features

Volkswagen Golf RDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagKnee AirbagABSEBDESPASRElectronic Parking BrakeHill Start AssistAuto HoldCruise ControlCollision Avoidance SystemDriver Fatigue DetectionComing HomeLeaving HomeTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip ComputerKeyless Startstart-stopArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsHeated Steering WheelLeather Steering WheelCooled GloveboxDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsFront Parking SensorsRear Parking SensorsReversing CameraAuto-dimming Rear-view MirrorRain SensorLight SensorFolding MirrorsXenon HeadlightsSunroofUSB PortBluetoothNavigation
Ford Shelby

No additional feature records are available.

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2024 Volkswagen Golf R and 2016 Ford Shelby approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Golf R leads the E-Kıyasla score by 16.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

Comments are loading…