DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Volkswagen Golf vs 2000 Citroen XM Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen XM

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

64.5–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeCitroen
GolfModelXM
1999Model year2000
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

8,1 s0–100 km/h8,4 s
222 km/hTop speed233 km/h
2861 ccEngine displacement2946 cc
190 HPPower190 HP
245 NmTorque267 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank80 lt
16,1 ltUrban consumption15,9 lt
8,2 ltExtra-urban consumption8,0 lt
10,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R15Tyre size205/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4340 mmLength4708 mm
1695 mmWidth1794 mm
1430 mmHeight1394 mm
1380 KgWeight1550 Kg
2475 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Volkswagen Golf and 2000 Citroen XM approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen XM leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…