DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Volkswagen Golf vs 2003 Volvo C70 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo C70

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeVolvo
GolfModelC70
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
3/5Doors2

Performance

9,3 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
203 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1968 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
140 HPPower163 HP
320 NmTorque230 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank68 lt
7,1 ltUrban consumption13,5 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption7,4 lt
5,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
195/65 R15 VTyre size225/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4204 mmLength4716 mm
1759 mmWidth1817 mm
1485 mmHeight1429 mm
1318 KgWeight1580 Kg
2578 mmWheelbase2660 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Volkswagen Golf and 2003 Volvo C70 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo C70 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…