1996 • Buick
Century
Buick Century 3.1 i V6 (162 Hp) 1996Overall Score64.5/100
1996 Buick Century vs 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Oldsmobile
Cutlass
Oldsmobile Cutlass 3.1 V6 (141 Hp) 1996Overall Score65.25/100
WINNER
Oldsmobile Cutlass
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Buick CenturySpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
BuickMakeOldsmobile
CenturyModelCutlass
1996Model year1996
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Buick CenturySpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
3136 ccEngine displacement3135 cc
162 HPPower141 HP
251 NmTorque251 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Buick CenturySpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank63 lt
—Urban consumption16 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9 lt
9,5 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Buick CenturySpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
185/75 R14 STyre size195/70 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Buick CenturySpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
4851 mmLength4921 mm
1762 mmWidth1804 mm
1377 mmHeight1391 mm
1419 KgWeight1450 Kg
2664 mmWheelbase2730 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Buick Century and 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Oldsmobile Cutlass leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…